Our union has filed two disputes against CBA regarding the bank’s outrageous decisions to offshore Australian jobs and replace roles with AI. One of these disputes has been escalated to the Fair Work Commission.
To strengthen our cases, we need evidence from you.
My job has been impacted by offshoring or AI because…
Please also ask your colleagues to take a few minutes to share their experience.
Our first dispute is regarding CBA’s so-called ‘genuine redundancies’. By making hundreds of jobs ‘redundant’ and then advertising them overseas, CBA has breached our Enterprise Agreement.
Our second dispute is regarding the 45 roles being replaced by AI. Despite us seeking more information, CBA has failed to provide evidence to substantiate its claim that the voice bot has reduced call volumes by 2000 per week.
The bank is also refusing to provide its health and safety risk assessment, or even explain how roles were selected for redundancy. The bank is also hiring similar roles with messaging duties at CBA India.
Thank you to those members who attended our union meetings last week. Together, we discussed a strategy to push back against CBA’s reckless anti-jobs agenda.
Depending on how our disputes progress, FSU members also endorsed a further escalation strategy.
70% of FSU members who responded to our CBA staffing audit stated that…
FSU members can view a recording of our information session held on 19…
Did you know that CBA’s website includes an entire section celebrating the different…
